🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.